At the outset, let me emphasize that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the 14th Amendment—“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of ...

The initial division of opinion is whether the Privileges or Immunities Clause was intended simply to require the states to make their laws apply equally to all their citizens or to mandate a ...

Many of the federal Supreme Court’s worst rulings are justified by the 14th Amendment – everything from anchor ...

The privileges or immunities clause of the 14th Amendment asserts that “no State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States.” ...

But five years later, in the infamous Slaughterhouse Cases, the Court eviscerated the Privileges or Immunities Clause, which was meant to be the principal font of substantive rights under the ...

"It would present significant issues under the privileges and immunities clause of the United States Constitution," Loyola University law professor Dane Ciolino said. According to Ciolino ...

On July 1, 2024, in Trump v. United States, the United States Supreme Court resolved the issue: “Whether and if so to what extent does a former President enjoy presidential immunity from criminal ...

Tracing the origins of the clause to parliamentary privilege, the Court found this ... does not provide any Member of Congress with any immunity from criminal prosecution. The Supreme Court ...

Legal experts say the privilege is a form of separation ... She argued she had immunity through the “speech and debate” clause, providing her protection from any civil lawsuits.